ATI FirePro V7770 vs GeForce GT 435M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1068not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.80no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF108RV770
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96800
Core clock speed650 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors585 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt76 Watt
Texture fill rate10.4025.00
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs1640
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data234 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s33.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API with Feature Level 12.110.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 76 Watt

GT 435M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 117.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 435M and FirePro V7770. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 435M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V7770 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
GeForce GT 435M
ATI FirePro V7770
FirePro V7770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 435M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V7770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 435M or FirePro V7770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.