ATI Radeon 7200 vs GeForce GT 430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10381611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency2.25no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGF108R100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 2010 (15 years ago)1 April 2000 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
CUDA cores per GPU96no data
Core clock speed700 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors585 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt23 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate11.201
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs166
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length145 mmno data
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)166 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 - 28.8 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI1x VGA
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.21.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 430 596
+29700%
Samples: 3097
ATI 7200 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
Valorant 6−7 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 7−8 no data

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2010 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 23 Watt

GT 430 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 113% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 430 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1328 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 430 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.