FirePro S10000 Passive vs GeForce GT 430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1029not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency2.26no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF108Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 October 2010 (15 years ago)12 November 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $3,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584 ×2
CUDA cores per GPU96no data
Core clock speed700 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors585 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt750 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate11.20106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs16112 ×2
L1 Cache128 KB448 KB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm305 mm
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 - 28.8 GB/s480 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Dual-link DVI support-+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2010 12 November 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 750 Watt

GT 430 has 1430.6% lower power consumption.

S10000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 430 and FirePro S10000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 430 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S10000 Passive is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GeForce GT 430
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
FirePro S10000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1295 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 430 or FirePro S10000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.