GeForce 7950 GT AGP vs GT 425M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1021not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.06no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGF108G71
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)2 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed560 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors585 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate8.96012.00
Floating-point processing power0.215 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 2 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 65 Watt

GT 425M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 182.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 425M and GeForce 7950 GT AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 425M is a notebook card while GeForce 7950 GT AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GeForce GT 425M
NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT AGP
GeForce 7950 GT AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 59 votes

Rate GeForce GT 425M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.