Quadro RTX 8000 vs GeForce GT 415M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GT 415M
0.74

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms GeForce GT 415M by 6626% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking111753
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.019.49
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN11P-GVTU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (13 years old)13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999
Current price$310 $3230 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 8000 has 94800% better value for money than GT 415M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484608
CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed500 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors585 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate3.0 billion/sec509.8
Floating-point performance96 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 415M and Quadro RTX 8000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type(G)DDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 415M 0.74
RTX 8000 49.77
+6626%

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms GeForce GT 415M by 6626% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 415M 286
RTX 8000 19286
+6643%

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms GeForce GT 415M by 6643% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GT 415M 751
RTX 8000 136245
+18042%

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms GeForce GT 415M by 18042% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6567%
400−450
+6567%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6567%
400−450
+6567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Hitman 3 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−6400%
260−270
+6400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.74 49.77
Recency 3 September 2010 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 260 Watt

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 415M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 415M is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
GeForce GT 415M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 22 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 438 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.