FirePro V7900 SDI vs GeForce GT 415M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1236not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.36no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGF108Cayman
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)24 May 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481280
Core clock speed500 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors585 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt224 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00058.00
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L1 Cache64 KB320 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x SDI
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 24 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 224 Watt

GT 415M has 1766.7% lower power consumption.

V7900 SDI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 415M and FirePro V7900 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 415M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V7900 SDI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
GeForce GT 415M
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
FirePro V7900 SDI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 29 votes

Rate GeForce GT 415M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 415M or FirePro V7900 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.