Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce GT 335M

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	1066	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.02	no data
Architecture	GT200 (2010)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	N11P-GS1	Beema
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	28 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price	$310	$380

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	72	128
CUDA cores	72	no data
Core clock speed	450 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	655 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	930 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.80	4.800
Floating-point performance	155.52 gflops	no data
Gigaflops	233	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 335M and Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
SLI options	+	no data

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	4.1	6.3
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Recency	7 January 2010	28 January 2015
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---