GMA 3150 vs GeForce GT 335M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1184	1603
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.40	no data
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code name	GT215	Pineview
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)	9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	72	16
Core clock speed	450 MHz	400 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	123 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	13 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.80	0.8
Floating-point processing power	0.1555 TFLOPS	0.0128 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	233	no data
ROPs	8	1
TMUs	24	2
L2 Cache	64 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCI
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	9.0c
Shader Model	4.1	3.0
OpenGL	2.1	2.0
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

16

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	7 January 2010	9 May 2007
Chip lithography	40 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	13 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---