Tesla C1060 vs GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGT216GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 April 2010 (15 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48240
Core clock speed500 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors486 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00048.80
Floating-point processing power0.1056 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1680
L2 Cache64 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.28 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2010 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 188 Watt

GT 330M Mac Edition has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 717.4% lower power consumption.

Tesla C1060, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition and Tesla C1060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C1060 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition
NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Tesla C1060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla C1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition or Tesla C1060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.