Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs GeForce GT 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1404not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.38no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG96CTahiti
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)31 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32768
Core clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors314 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00038.40
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS1.229 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1648
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cache32 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s240.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2009 31 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 85 Watt

GT 320M has 507.1% lower power consumption.

HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 320M and Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 320M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 136 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 320M or Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.