ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4 vs GeForce GT 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1403not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.36no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameG96CR300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed500 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors314 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.0002.600 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88 ×4
TMUs168 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCI
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed800 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s19.84 GB/s ×4
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DVI

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2009 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

GT 320M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 320M and Radeon 9700 PRO X4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 320M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M
ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4
Radeon 9700 PRO X4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 135 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 320M or Radeon 9700 PRO X4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.