Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs GeForce GT 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1346not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.32no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG96CViola
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)7 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323840
Core clock speed500 MHz2180 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors314 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt232 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000564.0
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS36.1 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data
Lengthno data386 mm
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2009 7 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 232 Watt

GT 320M has 1557.1% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 320M and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 320M is a notebook card while Playstation 5 Pro GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 126 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 59 votes

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.