GT 320M vs 9700M GT

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1178not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameNB9E-GEG96C
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (15 years old)21 January 2010 (14 years old)
Current price$310 $310
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3224
CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed625 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors314 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate10.008.000
Floating-point performance99.2 gflops80 gflops
Gigaflops148no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 9700M GT and GeForce GT 320M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IIMXM-II
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9700M GT 208
+98.1%
GT 320M 105

9700M GT outperforms GT 320M by 98% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

9700M GT 1750
+45.2%
GT 320M 1205

9700M GT outperforms GT 320M by 45% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 3 June 2008 21 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 14 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9700M GT and GeForce GT 320M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
GeForce 9700M GT
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 108 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.