ATI FireGL V7350 vs GeForce GT 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1415not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.49no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG96CR520
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed500 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors314 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt111 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0009.600
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs816
TMUs1616
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s41.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2009 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 111 Watt

GT 320M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 64% more advanced lithography process, and 693% lower power consumption.

ATI FireGL V7350, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 320M and FireGL V7350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 320M is a notebook graphics card while FireGL V7350 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 139 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 320M or FireGL V7350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.