Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics vs GeForce GT 320 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGT215Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 February 2010 (16 years ago)6 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72128
Core clock speed540 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data847 MHz
Number of transistors727 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.966.400
Floating-point processing power0.1875 TFLOPS0.2048 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length175 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed790 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.28 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.5 (6.0)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2010 6 June 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 15 Watt

R5E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 4 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 187% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 320 OEM and Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 320 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 91 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 320 OEM or Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.