Radeon 760M vs GeForce GT 240M LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data66.27
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameG96CPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 January 2010 (16 years ago)31 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32512
Core clock speed600 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2599 MHz
Number of transistors314 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60083.17
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L0 Cacheno data128 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2010 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1275% more advanced lithography process, and 53% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 240M LE and Radeon 760M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 240M LE is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 514 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 240M LE or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.