Radeon 550X vs GeForce GT 240M LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated777
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.45
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG96CLexa
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 January 2010 (16 years ago)27 March 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32512
Core clock speed600 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors314 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60038.98
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache32 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2010 27 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 50 Watt

GT 240M LE has 117.4% lower power consumption.

Radeon 550X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 240M LE and Radeon 550X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 240M LE is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 550X is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon 550X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 240M LE or Radeon 550X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.