Radeon X300 vs GeForce GT 240

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking985not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.01no data
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)Rage 9 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGT215RV370
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 November 2009 (14 years old)1 September 2004 (19 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$80 no data
Current price$708 (8.9x MSRP)$62
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed550 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors727 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt36 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105C Cno data
Texture fill rate17.601.500
Floating-point performance257.28 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm)no data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB or 1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGAHDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.22.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 17 November 2009 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB or 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 36 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 240 and Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 240
ATI Radeon X300
Radeon X300

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 755 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 28 votes

Rate ATI Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.