P106M vs GeForce GT 240

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking987not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGT215GP106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 November 2009 (14 years ago)23 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80 no data
Current price$708 (8.9x MSRP)$19.80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961152
CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed550 MHz1291 MHz
Number of transistors727 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105C Cno data
Texture fill rate17.6092.95
Floating-point performance257.28 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 240 and P106M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm)no data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB or 1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/s96.13 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGAHDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.24.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2009 23 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB or 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 75 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 240 and P106M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 240 is a desktop card while P106M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 240
NVIDIA P106M
P106M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 780 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate P106M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.