Radeon R9 370 1024SP vs GeForce GT 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1210not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.80no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG94BTrinidad
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)12 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481024
Core clock speed650 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data975 MHz
Number of transistors505 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6062.40
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS1.997 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2464
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cache64 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s179.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2009 12 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

GT 230 has 100% lower power consumption.

R9 370 1024SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 and Radeon R9 370 1024SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
GeForce GT 230
AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP
Radeon R9 370 1024SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 77 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 301 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230 or Radeon R9 370 1024SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.