ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 vs GeForce GT 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1217not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.79no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG94BRV630
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)26 July 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48120 ×2
Core clock speed650 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors505 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate15.606.400 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs164 ×2
TMUs248 ×2
L2 Cache64 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2009 26 July 2007
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm

GT 230 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 and Radeon HD 2600 XT X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 77 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230 or Radeon HD 2600 XT X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.