ATI FirePro V8750 vs GeForce GT 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1214not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.79no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG94BRV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)28 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43.99 $1,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48800
Core clock speed650 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors505 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6030.00
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2440
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache64 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s115.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2009 28 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 151 Watt

GT 230 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 101.3% lower power consumption.

ATI V8750, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 and FirePro V8750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 230 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V8750 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
GeForce GT 230
ATI FirePro V8750
FirePro V8750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 77 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230 or FirePro V8750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.