Tesla K40d vs GeForce GT 230 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG92BGK110B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 April 2009 (16 years ago)22 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962880
Core clock speed500 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speedno data876 MHz
Number of transistors754 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00210.2
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS5.046 TFLOPS
ROPs1248
TMUs48240
L1 Cacheno data240 KB
L2 Cache48 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.13.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 April 2009 22 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 245 Watt

GT 230 OEM has 226.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla K40d, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 OEM and Tesla K40d. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 230 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K40d is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
GeForce GT 230 OEM
NVIDIA Tesla K40d
Tesla K40d

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla K40d on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230 OEM or Tesla K40d, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.