ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX vs GeForce GT 230 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameG92BR350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 April 2009 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed500 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors754 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt94 Watt
Texture fill rate24.003.040
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128
TMUs488
L2 Cache48 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB128 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz680 MBps
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 94 Watt

GT 230 OEM has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 172.7% more advanced lithography process, and 25.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 OEM and Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
GeForce GT 230 OEM
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX
Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230 OEM or Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.