GMA X4500MHD vs GeForce GT 230 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameG92BCantiga
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 April 2009 (16 years ago)1 September 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9680
Core clock speed500 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors754 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate24.005.330
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.08528 TFLOPS
ROPs121
TMUs4810
L2 Cache48 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth24 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.0
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 April 2009 1 September 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 13 Watt

GT 230 OEM has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500MHD, on the other hand, has 476.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 OEM and GMA X4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 230 OEM is a desktop graphics card while GMA X4500MHD is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
GeForce GT 230 OEM
Intel GMA X4500MHD
GMA X4500MHD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate GMA X4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230 OEM or GMA X4500MHD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.