FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 230 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated847
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.43
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG92BRV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 April 2009 (16 years ago)16 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96800
Core clock speed500 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors754 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0025.00
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS1 TFLOPS
ROPs1216
TMUs4840
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache48 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz993 MHz
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s63.55 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 April 2009 16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

GT 230 OEM has an age advantage of 10 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 OEM and FireStream 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 230 OEM is a desktop graphics card while FireStream 9250 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230 OEM or FireStream 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.