ATI Radeon Xpress X1200 vs GeForce GT 220M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1326not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.09no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG96CRS690M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)1 February 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data350 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.000no data
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)no data
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2009 1 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm

GT 220M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 220M and Radeon Xpress X1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
GeForce GT 220M
ATI Radeon Xpress X1200
Radeon Xpress X1200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 100 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 66 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress X1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 220M or Radeon Xpress X1200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.