GRID K560Q vs GeForce GT 220M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1328not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.10no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG96CGK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)2 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321536 ×2
Core clock speed500 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors314 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00095.36 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs832 ×2
TMUs16128 ×2
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache32 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s160.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.13.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2009 2 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 225 Watt

GT 220M has 1507.1% lower power consumption.

GRID K560Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 220M and GRID K560Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 220M is a notebook graphics card while GRID K560Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
GeForce GT 220M
NVIDIA GRID K560Q
GRID K560Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 100 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K560Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 220M or GRID K560Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.