GeForce G110M vs GT 220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1208not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT216G96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)8 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4816
Core clock speed625 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors486 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt14 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate9.8403.200
Floating-point processing power0.1277 TFLOPS0.032 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs84
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth25.3 GB/s8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADVIHDMIDisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor support++
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIF + HDAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.12.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2009 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 14 Watt

GT 220 has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G110M, on the other hand, has 314.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 220 and GeForce G110M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 220 is a desktop card while GeForce G110M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220
NVIDIA GeForce G110M
GeForce G110M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 756 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce G110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.