Radeon RX 5300 XT vs GeForce GT 130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1328not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.34no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG96CNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)7 October 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321024
Core clock speed600 MHz1670 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1845 MHz
Number of transistors314 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate9.600118.1
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS3.779 TFLOPS
Gigaflops144no data
ROPs832
TMUs1664
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 (DDR2)/800 (GDDR3) MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 (DDR2)/25 (GDDR3)112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 150 Watt

GT 130M has 552% lower power consumption.

RX 5300 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 130M and Radeon RX 5300 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 130M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5300 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 24 votes

Rate GeForce GT 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 130M or Radeon RX 5300 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.