Radeon 530X Mobile vs GeForce GT 130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1342not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.16no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG96CPolaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2009 (16 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32384
Core clock speed600 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors314 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60024.58
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
Gigaflops144no data
ROPs88
TMUs1624
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache32 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 (DDR2)/800 (GDDR3) MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 (DDR2)/25 (GDDR3)36 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 18 April 2017
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 50 Watt

GT 130M has 117.4% lower power consumption.

530X Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 130M and Radeon 530X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
GeForce GT 130M
AMD Radeon 530X Mobile
Radeon 530X Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 24 votes

Rate GeForce GT 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon 530X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 130M or Radeon 530X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.