GeForce 8200M G mGPU vs G210 OEM Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT218C77
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 August 2009 (16 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616
Core clock speed589 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors260 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate4.7121.600
Floating-point processing power0.04486 TFLOPS0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 August 2009 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 12 Watt

G210 OEM Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

8200M G mGPU, on the other hand, has 158.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 and GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD
GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 or GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.