Radeon Pro 575X vs GeForce G205M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1392not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.65no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameC79Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)18 March 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed450 MHz1096 MHz
Number of transistors314 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600140.3
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data217.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 18 March 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 120 Watt

GeForce G205M has 757% lower power consumption.

Pro 575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G205M and Radeon Pro 575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G205M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 26 votes

Rate GeForce G205M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G205M or Radeon Pro 575X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.