Radeon Instinct MI350X vs GeForce G205M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1439not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.21no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)CDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameC79CDNA Next
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2009 (16 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616384
Core clock speed450 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors314 million185,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6002,252.8
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS72.09 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs81024
Tensor Coresno data1024
L1 Cacheno data4 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared288 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.19 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 1000 Watt

GeForce G205M has 7042.9% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI350X, on the other hand, has a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G205M and Radeon Instinct MI350X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G205M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI350X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G205M
GeForce G205M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X
Radeon Instinct MI350X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 26 votes

Rate GeForce G205M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI350X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G205M or Radeon Instinct MI350X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.