FireStream 9350 vs GeForce G205M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1390not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.65no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameC79Cypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)1 June 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161440
Core clock speed450 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors314 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60050.40
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS2.016 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs872
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 1 June 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce G205M has 971.4% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G205M and FireStream 9350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G205M is a notebook graphics card while FireStream 9350 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G205M
GeForce G205M
AMD FireStream 9350
FireStream 9350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 26 votes

Rate GeForce G205M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G205M or FireStream 9350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.