ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP vs GeForce G205M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1430not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.21no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 3 (1997−1998)
GPU code nameC79Rage 3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (16 years ago)1 March 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed450 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors314 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.6000.08
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs81

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared75 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 1 March 1997
Chip lithography 65 nm 350 nm

GeForce G205M has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 438.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G205M and 3D Rage PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G205M is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G205M
GeForce G205M
ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP
3D Rage PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 26 votes

Rate GeForce G205M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate 3D Rage PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G205M or 3D Rage PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.