Radeon Pro W6900X vs GeForce G110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.34
Power efficiencyno data10.68
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG96CNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)3 August 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165120
Core clock speed400 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2150 MHz
Number of transistors314 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200688.0
Floating-point processing power0.032 TFLOPS22.02 TFLOPS
Gigaflops48no data
ROPs4128
TMUs8320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L0 Cacheno data1.3 MB
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVI1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 3 August 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 300 Watt

GeForce G110M has 2042.9% lower power consumption.

Pro W6900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G110M and Radeon Pro W6900X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G110M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6900X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G110M
GeForce G110M
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
Radeon Pro W6900X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce G110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G110M or Radeon Pro W6900X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.