GeForce MX230 vs G110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.52
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG96CGP108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)21 February 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16256
Core clock speed400 MHz1519 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1582 MHz
Number of transistors314 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20025.31
Floating-point processing power0.032 TFLOPS0.81 TFLOPS
Gigaflops48no data
ROPs416
TMUs816
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 21 February 2019
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 10 Watt

GeForce MX230 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G110M and GeForce MX230. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G110M
GeForce G110M
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GeForce MX230

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce G110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1491 votes

Rate GeForce MX230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G110M or GeForce MX230, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.