Radeon RX Vega M vs GeForce G103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data80.44
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG98Vega
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)1 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speed640 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.12038.08
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs832
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce G103M has 7% lower power consumption.

RX Vega M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G103M and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G103M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 35 votes

Rate GeForce G103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G103M or Radeon RX Vega M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.