ATI Radeon HD 3870 vs GeForce G103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1067
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.05
Power efficiencyno data0.96
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG98RV670
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)19 November 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$269

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8320
Core clock speed640 MHz777 MHz
Number of transistors210 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rate5.12012.43
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS0.4973 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816
L2 Cache16 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1126 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s72.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 19 November 2007
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 106 Watt

GeForce G103M has an age advantage of 1 year, and 657.1% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 3870, on the other hand, has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G103M and Radeon HD 3870. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G103M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 3870 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G103M
GeForce G103M
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Radeon HD 3870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 35 votes

Rate GeForce G103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 187 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G103M or Radeon HD 3870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.