ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs GeForce G103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.43
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG98RV635
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)23 January 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8120
Core clock speed640 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors210 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate5.1205.800
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS0.174 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache16 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 23 January 2008
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 65 Watt

GeForce G103M has an age advantage of 1 year, and 364.3% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 3650 AGP, on the other hand, has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G103M and Radeon HD 3650 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G103M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 3650 AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G103M
GeForce G103M
ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Radeon HD 3650 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 35 votes

Rate GeForce G103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 28 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G103M or Radeon HD 3650 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.