GeForce 9300M G vs G103M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.18
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG98G86
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)1 February 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores816
Core clock speed640 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors210 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate5.1203.200
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache16 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 1 February 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 13 Watt

GeForce G103M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 23% more advanced lithography process.

9300M G, on the other hand, has 8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G103M and GeForce 9300M G. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 35 votes

Rate GeForce G103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G103M or GeForce 9300M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.