GRID M60-8Q vs GeForce G103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated506
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.17
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG98GM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speed640 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistors210 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate5.120150.8
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache16 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.15.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 225 Watt

GeForce G103M has 1507.1% lower power consumption.

GRID M60-8Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G103M and GRID M60-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G103M is a notebook graphics card while GRID M60-8Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G103M
GeForce G103M
NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
GRID M60-8Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 35 votes

Rate GeForce G103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M60-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G103M or GRID M60-8Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.