Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs GeForce G102M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameC79TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2009 (15 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164608
Core clock speed450 MHz1230 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors314 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600466.6
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS14.93 TFLOPS
Gigaflops48no data
ROPs496
TMUs8288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 1.0no data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 13 August 2018
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 260 Watt

GeForce G102M has 1757.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G102M and Quadro RTX 8000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G102M is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GeForce G102M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 40 votes

Rate GeForce G102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 20 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.