GeForce4 410 Go vs GeForce G102M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1332not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.20no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameC79NV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)6 February 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed450 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors314 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.6000.8
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops48no data
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 1.0no data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB16 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsVGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDSNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 6 February 2002
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

GeForce G102M has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G102M and GeForce4 410 Go. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 50 votes

Rate GeForce G102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 410 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G102M or GeForce4 410 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.