Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs GeForce G 110M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameN10M-GS1Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)7 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164096
Core clock speed400 MHz1408 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1668 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt345 Watt
Texture fill rateno data427.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.66 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data256
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data282 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 7 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 345 Watt

G 110M has 2364.3% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G 110M and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G 110M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G 110M
GeForce G 110M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce G 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 30 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 110M or Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.