Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs GeForce G 105M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1436not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.15no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameN10M-GE1GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2009 (16 years ago)11 November 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8192
Core clock speed640 MHz602 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.53
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data64
L2 Cacheno data192 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1536 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 150 Watt

G 105M has an age advantage of 1 month, and 971.4% lower power consumption.

FX 4800 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G 105M and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G 105M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G 105M
GeForce G 105M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 46 votes

Rate GeForce G 105M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 105M or Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.