UHD Graphics 730 vs GeForce G 103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G 103M with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

G 103M
2009
512 MB DDR2
0.15

Graphics 730 outperforms G 103M by a whopping 2453% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1487752
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Power efficiencyno data19.62
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG98Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8192
Core clock speed640 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

G 103M 0.15
UHD Graphics 730 3.83
+2453%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

G 103M 62
Samples: 117
UHD Graphics 730 1603
+2485%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
Valorant 24−27
−2400%
600−650
+2400%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−2445%
280−290
+2445%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Dota 2 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Valorant 24−27
−2400%
600−650
+2400%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Dota 2 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Valorant 24−27
−2400%
600−650
+2400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Valorant 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 3.83
Recency 1 September 2009 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 730 has a 2453.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G 103M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce G 103M is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G 103M
GeForce G 103M
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate GeForce G 103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1545 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 103M or UHD Graphics 730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.