Tesla C2090 vs GeForce G 103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1491not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG98GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speed640 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data41.66
Floating-point processing powerno data1.332 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data64
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm

Tesla C2090 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G 103M and Tesla C2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G 103M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C2090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate GeForce G 103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Tesla C2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 103M or Tesla C2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.