CMP 30HX vs GeForce G 103M

Place in the ranking	1490	431
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	4.43
Power efficiency	no data	7.86
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G98	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 September 2009 (16 years ago)	25 February 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	1408
Core clock speed	640 MHz	1530 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	125 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	157.1
Floating-point processing power	no data	5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	48
TMUs	no data	88
L1 Cache	no data	1.4 MB
L2 Cache	no data	1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 1.0 x4
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.0	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

G 103M 0.15

CMP 30HX 12.78
+8420%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

G 103M 62
Samples: 117

CMP 30HX 5346
+8523%

Samples: 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −8400%	85−90 +8400%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −7900%	400−450 +7900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −8400%	85−90 +8400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −8233%	250−260 +8233%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −7900%	400−450 +7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −7757%	550−600 +7757%
Valorant	24−27 −8233%	2000−2050 +8233%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	10−12 −8082%	900−950 +8082%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −8400%	85−90 +8400%
Dota 2	8−9 −8025%	650−700 +8025%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −8233%	250−260 +8233%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −7900%	400−450 +7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −7757%	550−600 +7757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −7900%	400−450 +7900%
Valorant	24−27 −8233%	2000−2050 +8233%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −8400%	85−90 +8400%
Dota 2	8−9 −8025%	650−700 +8025%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −8233%	250−260 +8233%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −7900%	400−450 +7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −7757%	550−600 +7757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −7900%	400−450 +7900%
Valorant	24−27 −8233%	2000−2050 +8233%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −8233%	250−260 +8233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −8400%	170−180 +8400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −8400%	85−90 +8400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −8400%	85−90 +8400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −8114%	1150−1200 +8114%
Valorant	1−2 −8400%	85−90 +8400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

−8400%

85−90
+8400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3
−8400%

170−180

+8400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.15	12.78
Recency	1 September 2009	25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	12 nm

CMP 30HX has a 8420% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The CMP 30HX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G 103M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce G 103M is a notebook graphics card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.